翻訳と辞書 ・ R v Seaboyer
・ R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 1)
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 2)
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Rees-Mogg
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p World Development Movement Ltd
・ R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex p O'Brien
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Doody
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Northumbria Police Authority
・ R v Sharpe
・ R v Shein
・ R v Shelembe
・ R v Shivpuri
・ R v Généreux
・ R v Hall
・ R v Hancock
・ R v Handy
・ R v Hape
・ R v Harbottle
・ R v Harrison
・ R v Hasan
・ R v Hauser
・ R v Hay
・ R v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School, ex p Begum
・ R v Hebert
・ R v Henry
・ R v Hess; R v Nguyen
・ R v Heywood
・ R v Hibbert
|
|
R v Hall
''R v Hall'', () 3 S.C.R. 309, 2002 SCC 64 is a leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the right not to be denied bail without just cause under section 11(e) of the ''Charter''.
==Background==
David Scott Hall was charged with the murder of a woman in a high-profile case. He applied for bail pending trial. The judge denied the application—not for reasons of ensuring appearance in court or protecting the public—but in order "to maintain confidence in the administration of justice". Paragraph (515(10)(c) ) of the Criminal Code allows the denial of bail for this reason.
Hall appealed the decision on the basis that section 515(10)(c) violated the right "not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause" under section 11(e) of the ''Charter''.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「R v Hall」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|